Adobe or Not Adobe
Adobe or Not Adobe Read More »
Adobe is a digital-media company that creates and sells products and tools that are primarily suited towards the creative economy. Their products include Photoshop and Lightroom, which are used to alter images, Premiere Pro, which is the standard video editing tool, and Adobe Document Reader, which allows people to view and export a standardized version of a digital document. There are free versions of their products, but Adobe makes its money from charging users a subscription fee to access all the products’ features.
Two weeks ago, Adobe released their Q2 2024 results. Revenue for the quarter was $5.31 billion, up 10% year on year. And operating income was $1.89 billion, up 16% year on year. The table below is a snapshot from Adobe’s earnings slide, which shows their core driver of revenue: Digital Media (DMe). The Creative segment within DMe accounted for just under 59% of their total revenue this quarter. Creative grew just under 10% year on year – in line with their revenue growth.
Despite many of Adobe’s products being industry standard tools, they are facing an increasing number of headwinds from both competitors and regulators.
In 2022, Adobe agreed to buy Figma (an interface design tool) for $20 billion. At the time, the deal placed an astronomical 50x revenue valuation on Figma. The deal faced regulatory scrutiny in the EU and was therefore cancelled before it could be completed. Adobe had to pay Figma a cancellation fee of $1 billion. Adobe is now being sued in the US, as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) claims that Adobe makes it too difficult for users to unsubscribe from their products.
Despite Adobe adding generative AI layers to their products, they are facing intense competition from the likes of Microsoft-backed OpenAI. OpenAI has many tools that directly compete with Adobe’s tools, allowing people to generate and edit texts and images using generative AI.
Adobe, once a gold standard, could be one of the first victims in the new generative AI world.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Adobe or Not Adobe Read More »
Lululemon, the athleisure brand, and Inditex (owner of fashion brands such as ZARA, Oysho, and others) primarily share one similarity: they both make clothes. However, these brands are quite different in terms of their target audience, operational methods, and growth stages.
Lululemon, founded in Vancouver, initially made yoga clothing before expanding into other types of athleisure for various sports. Lululemon has just over 700 stores around the world. Lululemon targets the upper-income segment, focusing on creating high-quality products primarily for women. This approach contrasts with other major athleisure brands like Nike and Adidas. Lululemon also sponsors local trainers and influencers, believing they have a closer connection with their community compared to big stars. Lululemon generally sets trends for each season, attempting to design and produce enough to meet the needs of its client base.
Inditex, on the other hand, operates quite differently. Catering to middle and upper-middle income groups, they have just under 7,300 stores worldwide. Inditex’s biggest brand, ZARA, focuses on offering customers the latest trends. ZARA uses a Just-in-Time vertical integration method. Their scouts attend fashion shows to identify trends, which are then sent to designers. These designs are quickly produced in factories and appear on shelves within 2-3 weeks. Depending on demand, ZARA can easily ramp up or scale down production, producing closer to what is actually needed. This results in there being just enough items in their stores to meet demand.
Despite Inditex being just under 4 times bigger than Lululemon in terms of market cap, the graph below shows how similar their gross and operating margins are. The also both have a PE ratio of around 25.
Last week, Lululemon and Inditex released their respective Q1 2024 results. Lululemon’s revenue for the quarter was $2.2 billion, up 10% year-on-year, while operating income was $432.6 million, up 7.7% year-on-year. Lululemon attributed the weakness in their sales growth to a limited colour range in certain women’s products in the US, missing an opportunity to meet demand. Combined with slowing overall demand in the US and Europe, heightened competition in the athleisure space, and the missed opportunity, Lululemon’s stock price has decreased by over 35% year-to-date.
Inditex, on the other hand, had a revenue of €8.2 billion for the quarter, up 7.1% year-on-year. While their operating income was €1.6 billion for the quarter, up 10.3% year-on-year. Inditex expressed that they are planning to spend €1.8 billion, over the next two years, on their supply chain as they look to bolster up their e-commerce offering, while also maintaining their physical presence with their stores.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
A Day out Shopping Read More »
The no-frills, ultra-low-cost warehouse retailer Costco, does everything it can to lower the prices of the products it sells. With the surge in inflation over the last two years, Costco is benefiting from the trend of people wanting to pay the lowest prices possible for goods. Here are some of the strategies Costco uses to keep their prices low.
Last week, Costco released their Q3 2024 results. Total revenue for the quarter was $58.5 billion, up 9.1% year-on-year. Costco’s gross margin was 12.5%, far lower than many retailers. Operating income increased by 30.8% to reach $2.2 billion for the quarter. This represented an operating margin of 3.8% for the quarter.
Costco has built a cult-like fanbase among its customers, gaining customers across different income levels. Not only do they sell hotdogs for $1.50 and rotisserie chickens for $5, they also sell gold bars as customers attempt to beat inflation on another front.
Costco is trading at a relatively high multiple. Their price to earnings (PE) ratio is currently hovering around the 50 mark, whereas Walmart is trading at a PE ratio of around 28. Costco operates in an extremely competitive industry with very low margins. Any missteps in their operating activities could cause their bottom line to suffer tremendously.
Walmart is held in the Lunar Capital BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Costco – One up on Inflation Read More »
Nvidia, the graphics processing unit (GPU) designer, had another standout quarter. Since the beginning of the year, Nvidia’s share price has increased by over 120%. Big tech companies such as Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta are buying Nvidia’s chips for their data centers so that they can enhance their artificial intelligence capabilities. Companies and researchers are then able to train and run their large language models from these data centers. To get an idea on how these big some of these AI investments have been, Meta (owners of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp) top of acquired 24 thousand H100 GPU chips, which go for between $25000 and $40000 each, to power their Lambda AI service.
Nvidia released their Q1 2025 results last week. Revenue for the quarter was $26 billion, up 262% compared to the same quarter last year. Net income for Nvidia was $14.9 billion, up 628%. Data center revenue, which includes the revenue recognized from the sale of chips for artificial intelligence, was $22.6 billion, up 427% year on year. Nvidia’s gross margin was 78.4% and its net margin 57.1%.
The H100 platform is currently the top-of-the-line chip platform in the market. However, Nvidia has developed a new platform, Blackwell, expected to be released later this year. The Blackwell platform performs 4x faster in training LLM models and 30x faster in inferencing (where the trained LLMs draw conclusions from new inputs) compared to the H100 platform. Nvidia faces the risk of overdeveloping their chips, where customers may wait out certain generations of chips to get the next generation, which is significantly better. Nvidia, however, is confident that current demand far outstrips current supply for both the H100 and Blackwell chips.
Nvidia developed the CUDA software platform to expand the use of its chips in various applications, including AI. However, CUDA is exclusive to Nvidia’s chips. Due to the heavy reliance on Nvidia’s chips, their limited supply, and high costs, other developers have created an open software platform called Triton. This platform allows developers to run AI applications on an array of other chips.
Nvidia also faces significant competition in the chip design field. They are not only competing with established designers like AMD, but also with well-capitalized companies such as Amazon and Microsoft, who are developing their own chips to reduce their reliance on Nvidia. Nvidia has stated that their chip cycle is one year between each generation, so competing companies are aiming at a moving target going at breakneck speed.
Nvidia, Amazon, and Microsoft are held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Nvidia – Silicon Supreme Read More »
Last week, Walmart released their Q1 2025 results. The group’s revenue reached $161.5 billion for the quarter, growing 6% year-on-year. Operating income rose by 9.6% to $6.8 billion. Walmart’s gross margin increased from 23.7% a year ago to 24.1% this quarter. This improvement was due to fewer inventory markdowns compared to last year. Additionally, Walmart’s advertising business, which typically has a higher gross margin than general retail, has been growing faster than other parts of the business, contributing to the overall margin increase. With this in mind, Walmart’s management team stressed that they are trying to keep their product gross margin as low as possible so as to incentivise more customers to shop with them. Walmart indicated that they have seen a meaningful increase in higher-income earners shopping at their stores. Walmart’s e-commerce business grew by 22% on a quarter-to-quarter basis, showing good returns on their technology spend.
Walmart and other large retailers generally perform well in inflationary environments. They can buy in bulk, which helps lower their prices. Additionally, when they place orders in advance, they secure prices at that time. Once the goods are delivered and ready to be sold, the new, higher inflationary prices are evident in the economy. This allows them to sell at those higher prices or slightly less, giving the impression of saving customers money compared to smaller and/or less efficient businesses that order closer to the time of sale.
Walmart faces intense competition worldwide. They not only compete against local retailers but also against giants like Amazon, which has a highly profitable cloud business. From its inception, Walmart has focused on serving underrepresented locations, offering customers an all-in-one store with “everyday low prices.”
Walmart is held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Walmart – The Best Offense starts in Defense Read More »
Amazon, once an online bookseller, has gradually transformed into the expansive “everything store.” Utilizing its efficient fulfillment infrastructure, Amazon swiftly delivers both its own products and third-party products worldwide. While its e-commerce segment drives the bulk of revenue, the true profit engine lies in its cloud division: AWS. In the latest quarter, Amazon’s North American e-commerce unit generated $86 billion in revenue with a 5.7% operating margin, while AWS generated $25 billion in revenue with a notable 37.6% operating margin. Amazon’s free cash flow was $50.1bn for the last twelve months, demonstrating its significant financial strength.
Amazon is renowned for identifying pain points within their own operations and devising solutions to overcome them, and then selling that solution as a service to third parties. In this way, they turn cost centres into profit centres. When they managed their internet servers, they noticed significant periods of dormancy in their IT infrastructure, punctuated by occasional spikes in usage. Recognizing this, Amazon seized the opportunity to create AWS. Instead of companies needing to set up and manage their IT infrastructure, Amazon does it for a fee, based on usage. Today, global enterprises rely on AWS to power their entire operations. Now, AWS is increasingly being employed by companies to train their generative AI models. Amazon observed that many companies are still in the training phase of their generative AI products, and that the products aren’t available for the market just yet.
Amazon has followed the same principle with regards to their fulfillment service. Companies are able to sell their products internationally on Amazon’s platform, while not needing to go through the process of figuring out the complicated rates and tariffs they are required to pay in each country.
Amazon’s reach extends far beyond e-commerce and cloud computing. They also run a video-streaming platform, own a significant share of an electric car company (Rivian), and operate an advertising business integrated with their e-commerce operations, which generated $11.8 billion in revenue this recent quarter. Advertising, known for its high operating margins, is likely to contribute to Amazon’s growing profitability.
Yet, amidst their diverse ventures, Amazon faces formidable competition. Beyond rival e-commerce and traditional retail businesses, they contend with tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft. Big Tech is also facing increased regulatory pressure around the world.
Amazon’s origins in a low-margin environment have instilled a cost-effective mindset into their DNA. They have shown, time and again, how to develop new products and services while keeping costs low.
Amazon and Microsoft are held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Amazon – Not your everyday Bookseller Read More »
Microsoft unveiled their Q3 2024 results last week. Revenue for the quarter reached $61.9 billion, marking a 17% year-over-year increase. Meanwhile, net income for the same period amounted to $21.9 billion, reflecting a 20% year-over-year rise. The primary growth driver for Microsoft’s revenue was their cloud services segment, encompassing products and services such as OneDrive and Azure. Cloud services revenue for the quarter totalled $35.1 billion, increasing by 23% year-over-year. As of Friday, 26 April, Microsoft held the title of the world’s most valued stock, boasting a valuation of just over $3 trillion.
Microsoft has been among the beneficiaries of the Large Language Model hype that surged last year and this year. Microsoft has invested approximately $13 billion in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT. Microsoft does not have any ownership stake in OpenAI. But, they are entitled to a share of profit distributions. Microsoft’s cloud service, Azure, enables businesses to deploy their AI applications using their servers. However, Microsoft has stated that the demand for their AI services currently surpasses their current capacity. Consequently, they are ramping up their capital expenditure. In the latest quarter, they spent $14 billion on capital expenditure, exceeding the anticipated $11 billion.
Microsoft encounters formidable competition from other well-resourced rivals such as Amazon and Alphabet in the cloud computing/AI arena. As companies expand, scaling their market share becomes progressively challenging compared to their initial growth trajectory. Frequently, firms seeking to increase their market presence through acquisitions find themselves paying a premium to entice shareholders. Recently, Microsoft concluded its acquisition of the gaming giant Activision for just under $70 billion. Only time will reveal whether Microsoft has potentially overpaid for the company, or whether they were able to use their platform to create a more compelling gaming experience for users.
Microsoft not only provides cloud and gaming services, it’s Office suite of business tools is widely used in businesses and homes worldwide, it also provides on-line security, data management, virtual meeting services (Teams) and search services, amongst others.
Microsoft and Amazon held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Microsoft: On Cloud Nine Read More »
Semiconductors or chips regulate electrical flow in electronic devices. They are vital for various products like computers, artificial intelligence (AI) systems, smartphones, automotive vehicles, and military equipment. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) manufactures roughly 90% of the world’s cutting-edge chips, while ASML crafts lithography machinery essential for making these chips smaller and more energy-efficient.
Last week, TSMC and ASML released their Q1 2024 results. TSMC saw a 16.5% increase in revenue to NT$592 billion (with an average USD/NTD exchange rate of 31.4) compared to the same quarter last year. While ASML reported €5.29 billion in revenue for the quarter, marking a 21.5% decline from the same period last year. Due to the recent interest around AI, high performance computing chips accounted for 46% of TSMC’s revenue for the quarter.
ASML believes that the semiconductor industry is going to go through a transitory year this year. Orders for its machinery for Q1 2024 dipped nearly 4% compared to the same quarter last year and decreased by 60% compared to the previous quarter. Some of ASML’s latest extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines go for around €350 million each. Consequently, manufacturers must be certain about their timing for acquiring lithography equipment. ASML anticipates its revenue for the year to remain consistent with 2023 levels. Subsequently, it’s positioning itself to escalate production for 2025.
The US Chips Act aims to encourage semiconductor manufacturers to establish plants within the United States. TSMC and Samsung have each secured approximately $6.5 billion in grants and subsidies to construct facilities in the US. ASML stands to benefit significantly from the Chips Act, given its near monopoly on the sale of EUV lithography machinery worldwide. However, due to the scale of these projects, there is an elevated risk of delays. Consequently, ASML faces the challenge of potentially building up inventory without the ability to deliver products, whilst these new facilities are being constructed. This could impact their near-term financial performance. However, when these new facilities are ready, they would need to be furbished with ASML’s lithography machines, which will likely be very positive for ASML.
The demand for more and more computing power to process the growing demand for AI, smartphones, EV’s and larger and more complex cloud service providers; is adding strain to energy grids. This is driving both the design and manufacture of more energy efficient semiconductors, as well as alternative energy solutions.
ASML is held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Gearing Up – A Semiconductor Story Read More »
Last week, JP Morgan released its Q1 2024 results. The quarterly net revenue increased to $41.9 billion, marking a 9% increase from the preceding quarter. Net income also saw a significant increase, reaching $13.4 billion, up 44% from the previous quarter. Provisions for credit losses witnessed a decline of 32%, settling at $1.9 billion. JP Morgan upheld a steady return on equity of 17%.
Despite the increase in revenue, Net Interest Income (NII) declined 4% due to deposit margin compression and the overall amount of deposits decreasing. This was mainly seen in the Consumer and Community Banking (CCB) section of JP Morgan. However, due to the rise in the US equities market last year, CCB investment assets were up 25%.
JP Morgan expressed that despite the strong economic indicators, such as the strong unemployment rate and wages in the US, there is still a lot of uncertainty in the market such as the ongoing geopolitical tensions and a large number of persistent inflationary pressures. JP Morgan also highlighted that the bank has not experienced this level of quantitative tightening at this scale before. The effects are likely only going to be seen over the long term. These comments likely caused the stock price to slide by just over 6% following the results disclosure.
JP Morgan benefitted from the recent regional banking crisis in the US when they purchased First Republic. This contributed to their growth in assets, revenues, and profits. JP Morgan prides itself on its “fortress balance sheet”; which in turn allows it to take advantage of large deals when they become available.
JP Morgan is held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
JP Morgan and the Fortress Balance Sheet Read More »
When companies grow to become large/mega cap businesses, they face both challenges and opportunities when they try to grow further. The specific circumstances for each company’s position significantly influences the potential or the impediments for continued expansion. Below are a few examples of some of the challenges and opportunities these companies may face.
The Challenges
Acquisitions
In acquisitions, large companies face a limited pool of targets due to fewer medium and large-sized companies compared to the number of small companies. Factors like compatibility and pricing reduce this pool further. With greater financial resources, acquiring companies often pay a premium for these companies to entice them to join. This trend is evident across numerous instances. For instance, in 2014, Facebook acquired WhatsApp for $19 billion. A decade later, WhatsApp boasts over 2 billion users but generates minimal revenue, estimated at around $1.2 billion for the previous year. Warren Buffett also regularly advises the lack of potential acquisition targets that Berkshire Hathaway can make to make a meaningful difference in their portfolio.
Product line and different markets
As companies achieve significant market share in different markets, introducing new products or expanding into new markets may not provide the same revenue and profit increases they previously enjoyed. Nike is currently experiencing this. Despite Nike rolling out numerous new products Nike’s revenue has had a compound annual growth rate of 7.2% for the last 2 fiscal years.
Corporate Constraints
As companies grow, their delivery platforms and teams need to be expanded to support their enlarged customer base and higher volumes. This may have been achieved with previous generation technologies and smaller more agile and flexible teams. With a larger client base and higher volumes and a complex platform, they may not be as agile as they previously were, increasing the time and costs of rolling out new products, services, and features; and allowing smaller, more nimble competitors to steal a march on them. Google is experiencing this with the roll-out of their AI tools, for example.
The Opportunities
Platforms
Businesses built as platforms, i.e. where multiple services are provided to clients, and new products or services can be added very quickly, however have an advantage despite their large/mega size. As platform businesses Microsoft, for example can expand by adding new features and services to their platform and further entrench existing and new customers into their ecosystem. Microsoft’s 365 product suite facilitates bundling various products, making it challenging for customers to switch once integrated. Moreover, they swiftly deploy new products to a vast customer base. For instance, between 2017 and 2023, the number of Microsoft Teams users surged from 2 million to 320 million, solidifying its leadership in virtual meetings arena.
There are many opportunities for companies to grow, but as they keep on growing there are certain challenges that they face. Some companies have a better ability to deal with these challenges than others.
Berkshire Hathaway and Microsoft are held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund. They are also held by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Balancing the Scale Read More »
Insights to your Inbox
Contact Details
Lunar Capital (Pty) Limited, registration number 2015/013022/07 is an authorised South African financial services provider (FSP 46567) established in 2015. As a licensed Financial Services Provider in terms of the FAIS Act, Lunar Capital (Pty) Limited accepts responsibility for its representatives acting within their mandates, in rendering services defined by FAIS. Our key individual and representative meet the fit and proper requirements as prescribed by FAIS.