Luxury Wars

Author: Danyaal Munshi

Luxury Wars

Over the last two weeks, luxury fashion houses LVMH, Kering, and Hermes released their revenue figures for the third quarter. The companies reported weaker demand from various regions around the world as consumers show less inclination to purchase luxury items during tighter economic conditions and rising costs. Consumers are more selective with their purchases. The graph below shows the revenue for Q3 2023 compared to Q3 2024 from these luxury houses. 

Graph Showing Luxury Houses Revenue for Q3 2024

LVMH oversees numerous luxury brands, including Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, Moet & Chandon, Hennessy, and Sephora. The company’s revenue dipped by 4%, mainly due to declines in its Wine and Spirits and Fashion and Luxury segments. It was partially offset by a rise in its Perfume and Cosmetics segment. The company operates globally, with an expanding presence in Asia. The depreciation of the Japanese Yen has led to consumers purchasing more in Japan, making Japan one of LVMH’s best-performing regions this year. 

Kering, which owns Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent, has a more concentrated portfolio than LVMH. Gucci made up over 40% of Kering’s revenue this quarter but saw a 26% sales drop from the same quarter last year. Facing macroeconomic challenges and a lack of consumer resonance with their products, Kering has changed Gucci’s leadership to try to revitalize the brand. Overall, Kering’s sales declined 15% year over year. 

Hermes, which has an even tighter portfolio, has experienced significant growth in the luxury sector in recent years. It has seen its sales this quarter increase by 10% year over year. The company targets ultra-high-net-worth individuals. Some bags sold by Hermes have year-long waitlists and can be priced around ten thousand euros. The company strategically limits the number of items sold to create higher demand for its products.  

Consumer preferences can be unpredictable, significantly impacting the success of companies. Luxury brands not only compete with each other, but also compete with athleisure brands like Lululemon, which traditionally were not considered direct competitors.  

Security
Key Indicators

Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.

Our email address is: [email protected]

Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet  can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.

Share article

Latest Posts

What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market.
SpaceX-cluded
What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market
CrowdStrike’s latest quarterly results reflect a business that continues to scale at an impressive rate, while also illustrating some of the tensions between growth, profitability, and valuation that increasingly define the cybersecurity sector. The company reported total quarterly revenue of $1.39 billion, up 26% year-on-year, reinforcing its position as one of the fastest-growing large-cap cybersecurity platforms. Growth was supported by strong demand across its Falcon platform, with net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $256 million, up 32%. This brought total ending ARR to $5.51 billion, a 24% increase, highlighting the durability of its subscription-based model and the continued expansion of its installed base. Despite this top-line momentum, profitability remains work in progress. CrowdStrike reported a GAAP operating loss of $30.6 million, a meaningful improvement from the $108.7 million loss recorded in the prior period, but still indicative of a business investing heavily in growth. While the trajectory is clearly improving, the pace of margin expansion remains a key area of focus for investors, particularly as the business scales. A central theme in management’s commentary was the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The company pointed to what it described as an inflection point, where AI is not only enhancing defensive capabilities but is increasingly being weaponised by attackers. The proliferation of AI-driven threats raises the complexity and frequency of cyberattacks, reinforcing the need for advanced, real-time protection. In this context, CrowdStrike’s access to leading AI models through partnerships with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic stands out as an important competitive advantage. These relationships, alongside collaborations with Microsoft and IBM, position CrowdStrike at the centre of an evolving ecosystem where cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, and AI capabilities are becoming deeply interconnected. Stock-based compensation still remains elevated and continues to weigh on the company’s path to sustained profitability. While common across high-growth technology businesses, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders and, at current levels, raises questions about long-term margin structure. Valuation is another important consideration. CrowdStrike continues to trade at a premium relative to its revenue base, reflecting both its growth profile and its perceived strategic importance in the cybersecurity landscape. However, this also leaves less room for execution missteps. Notably, while revenues grew by 26%, this fell short of some market expectations, suggesting that the bar remains high and that incremental disappointments can have an outsized impact on sentiment.
Crowding out the Competition
Cybersecurity for the AI era
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Brick and E-commerce
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon

Lunar Capital
on Eastwave Radio

Every Wednesday, at 07h45, Sabir chats with Nazia from Eastwave Radio (92.2 fm, live stream on
www.eastwave.co.za) on investing and the markets.

eastwave-radio