Earnings season has started, and JP Morgan has released their Q2 2024 results. Net revenue for the quarter was $50.2 billion, up 22% year on year, while net income for the quarter was $18.1 billion. On May 6th, JP Morgan announced that it would exchange its Visa Class B-1 stock for Visa Class B-2 and Class C common stock, resulting in a one-time net gain of $7.9 billion for the company. After removing this net gain, contributions to JP Morgan’s Foundation, and discretionary security losses, JP Morgan’s adjusted net income stood at $13.1 billion.
Jamie Dimon, the Chairman and CEO, noted significant achievements, including the opening of 450 thousand net new checking accounts and a 14% increase in investment assets, reaching $1 trillion. However, he also pointed out that lower-income customers are showing slight signs of stress due to high interest rates and persistent inflation, which have reduced their savings from pandemic levels.
Dimon emphasized that JP Morgan remains cautious in the current market, citing the geopolitical situation as potentially the most dangerous since World War II. He also mentioned the uncertainty surrounding the full effects of the quantitative tightening carried out in 2022. Despite these challenges, JP Morgan’s robust balance sheet, with a standardized capital ratio of 15.3%, demonstrates the bank’s ability to handle a wide range of environments.
After the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023, Lunar Capital began acquiring JP Morgan stock in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and for our offshore portfolio clients. Our view was that as smaller banks are under strain, the better-run banks, such as JP Morgan, would gain new customers and deposits. This increased market share and reduced competition provides an additional boost to the quality bank’s revenues, margins and profits.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Generative AI relies on supercomputers to perform complex calculations and answer increasingly intricate questions. It is thus highly dependent on advanced semiconductors (chips), large data sets and powerful algorithms (models). The energy requirements of these processors, which are typically housed in datacentres, are enormous and require stable and secure power sources.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), energy for data centres, cryptocurrency, and artificial intelligence accounted for roughly 2% of global energy demand in 2022. The IEA forecasts that the energy demand could almost double from 460 TWh in 2022 to about 800 TWh by 2026. However, these estimates may vary significantly depending on the actual demand for generative AI products and services over the next two years.
Cloud computing giants like Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are heavily investing in their data centres to enhance their capabilities for running complex AI applications. This involves training and inferencing (producing outputs) with AI models. Consequently, their energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions have risen. According to Alphabet’s 2024 Environmental Report, their greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 48% since 2019. The growing demand for AI, combined with Alphabet’s termination of some clean energy projects, has led to this overall increase in its emissions.
Why haven’t companies simply expanded their energy capacity? Data centres require a stable energy supply that can be adjusted instantly. Renewable energy is not always reliable due to its dependence on unpredictable elements. Nuclear power can provide the needed stability, but building nuclear plants takes more than five years. In contrast, gas-fired plants take about two years to build.
The cloud providers are exploring various ways to increase their access to stable energy sources. Earlier this year, Amazon bought a data centre from US power generator Talen Energy, located next to a nuclear power station. The data centre will be powered with energy from the station.
Microsoft on the other hand, signed a power purchase agreement with Brookfield Asset Management, to support the development of 10.5 gigawatts of renewable energy and to secure their energy requirements and offset their carbon footprint.
At the core of these new data centres are semiconductors responsible for all processing tasks. Nvidia claims that their flagship Blackwell Platform will enable organizations to “build and run real-time generative AI on trillion-parameter large language models at up to 25x less cost and energy consumption than its predecessor.” No wonder everyone is racing to get their hands on these chips.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
AI: The Energy Saga Read More »
Last week Nike released their Q4 and FY2024 results. Revenue for the year was $51.4 billion, flat compared to 2023. Net Income for the year was $5.7 billion, up 12% compared to the same period last year. Below is a graph showing key metrics for Nike over the last four years. Since 2021, Nike’s revenue has increased just over 13 percent. While its net income has remained flat.
Before the Covid-19 pandemic, Nike had already started investing in its Nike Direct business, which includes company-operated stores and its e-commerce division. This focus on e-commerce proved beneficial both before and during the pandemic when consumers were unable to leave their homes. Nike Direct accounted for just under 44% of Nike Brand revenue in 2024, compared to 32% in 2019. The wholesale business, which sells to third-party stores on consignment, accounted for 56% of Nike Brand revenue in 2024.
Over the last few years, running has surged in popularity, likely due to pent-up demand from the Covid-19 pandemic. The London Marathon received a record 840,000 applications for the ballot for the 2025 race, surpassing the previous record of 578,000 in 2024. Despite its roots in running, Nike has struggled to capitalize on this trend, losing market share to competitors like On Holding, Hoka (owned by Deckers), and Brooks.
Fashion is fickle. Brands that are successful today may not be next year, and vice versa. Nike faces the challenge of growing revenue from an already high base. For example, Hoka’s 2024 revenue was $1.11 billion, roughly 2% of Nike’s 2024 revenue. Nike has better financial strength compared to many of its competitors to withstand setbacks. It could possibly even use this to pivot its company to get back in favour with consumers.
Nike’s share price is down from a peak of $179.10 (November 2021) to $74.85 per share at the time of writing.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Nike Just Not Doing It Read More »
Adobe is a digital-media company that creates and sells products and tools that are primarily suited towards the creative economy. Their products include Photoshop and Lightroom, which are used to alter images, Premiere Pro, which is the standard video editing tool, and Adobe Document Reader, which allows people to view and export a standardized version of a digital document. There are free versions of their products, but Adobe makes its money from charging users a subscription fee to access all the products’ features.
Two weeks ago, Adobe released their Q2 2024 results. Revenue for the quarter was $5.31 billion, up 10% year on year. And operating income was $1.89 billion, up 16% year on year. The table below is a snapshot from Adobe’s earnings slide, which shows their core driver of revenue: Digital Media (DMe). The Creative segment within DMe accounted for just under 59% of their total revenue this quarter. Creative grew just under 10% year on year – in line with their revenue growth.
Despite many of Adobe’s products being industry standard tools, they are facing an increasing number of headwinds from both competitors and regulators.
In 2022, Adobe agreed to buy Figma (an interface design tool) for $20 billion. At the time, the deal placed an astronomical 50x revenue valuation on Figma. The deal faced regulatory scrutiny in the EU and was therefore cancelled before it could be completed. Adobe had to pay Figma a cancellation fee of $1 billion. Adobe is now being sued in the US, as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) claims that Adobe makes it too difficult for users to unsubscribe from their products.
Despite Adobe adding generative AI layers to their products, they are facing intense competition from the likes of Microsoft-backed OpenAI. OpenAI has many tools that directly compete with Adobe’s tools, allowing people to generate and edit texts and images using generative AI.
Adobe, once a gold standard, could be one of the first victims in the new generative AI world.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Adobe or Not Adobe Read More »
Lululemon, the athleisure brand, and Inditex (owner of fashion brands such as ZARA, Oysho, and others) primarily share one similarity: they both make clothes. However, these brands are quite different in terms of their target audience, operational methods, and growth stages.
Lululemon, founded in Vancouver, initially made yoga clothing before expanding into other types of athleisure for various sports. Lululemon has just over 700 stores around the world. Lululemon targets the upper-income segment, focusing on creating high-quality products primarily for women. This approach contrasts with other major athleisure brands like Nike and Adidas. Lululemon also sponsors local trainers and influencers, believing they have a closer connection with their community compared to big stars. Lululemon generally sets trends for each season, attempting to design and produce enough to meet the needs of its client base.
Inditex, on the other hand, operates quite differently. Catering to middle and upper-middle income groups, they have just under 7,300 stores worldwide. Inditex’s biggest brand, ZARA, focuses on offering customers the latest trends. ZARA uses a Just-in-Time vertical integration method. Their scouts attend fashion shows to identify trends, which are then sent to designers. These designs are quickly produced in factories and appear on shelves within 2-3 weeks. Depending on demand, ZARA can easily ramp up or scale down production, producing closer to what is actually needed. This results in there being just enough items in their stores to meet demand.
Despite Inditex being just under 4 times bigger than Lululemon in terms of market cap, the graph below shows how similar their gross and operating margins are. The also both have a PE ratio of around 25.
Last week, Lululemon and Inditex released their respective Q1 2024 results. Lululemon’s revenue for the quarter was $2.2 billion, up 10% year-on-year, while operating income was $432.6 million, up 7.7% year-on-year. Lululemon attributed the weakness in their sales growth to a limited colour range in certain women’s products in the US, missing an opportunity to meet demand. Combined with slowing overall demand in the US and Europe, heightened competition in the athleisure space, and the missed opportunity, Lululemon’s stock price has decreased by over 35% year-to-date.
Inditex, on the other hand, had a revenue of €8.2 billion for the quarter, up 7.1% year-on-year. While their operating income was €1.6 billion for the quarter, up 10.3% year-on-year. Inditex expressed that they are planning to spend €1.8 billion, over the next two years, on their supply chain as they look to bolster up their e-commerce offering, while also maintaining their physical presence with their stores.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
A Day out Shopping Read More »
The no-frills, ultra-low-cost warehouse retailer Costco, does everything it can to lower the prices of the products it sells. With the surge in inflation over the last two years, Costco is benefiting from the trend of people wanting to pay the lowest prices possible for goods. Here are some of the strategies Costco uses to keep their prices low.
Last week, Costco released their Q3 2024 results. Total revenue for the quarter was $58.5 billion, up 9.1% year-on-year. Costco’s gross margin was 12.5%, far lower than many retailers. Operating income increased by 30.8% to reach $2.2 billion for the quarter. This represented an operating margin of 3.8% for the quarter.
Costco has built a cult-like fanbase among its customers, gaining customers across different income levels. Not only do they sell hotdogs for $1.50 and rotisserie chickens for $5, they also sell gold bars as customers attempt to beat inflation on another front.
Costco is trading at a relatively high multiple. Their price to earnings (PE) ratio is currently hovering around the 50 mark, whereas Walmart is trading at a PE ratio of around 28. Costco operates in an extremely competitive industry with very low margins. Any missteps in their operating activities could cause their bottom line to suffer tremendously.
Walmart is held in the Lunar Capital BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Costco – One up on Inflation Read More »
Nvidia, the graphics processing unit (GPU) designer, had another standout quarter. Since the beginning of the year, Nvidia’s share price has increased by over 120%. Big tech companies such as Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta are buying Nvidia’s chips for their data centers so that they can enhance their artificial intelligence capabilities. Companies and researchers are then able to train and run their large language models from these data centers. To get an idea on how these big some of these AI investments have been, Meta (owners of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp) top of acquired 24 thousand H100 GPU chips, which go for between $25000 and $40000 each, to power their Lambda AI service.
Nvidia released their Q1 2025 results last week. Revenue for the quarter was $26 billion, up 262% compared to the same quarter last year. Net income for Nvidia was $14.9 billion, up 628%. Data center revenue, which includes the revenue recognized from the sale of chips for artificial intelligence, was $22.6 billion, up 427% year on year. Nvidia’s gross margin was 78.4% and its net margin 57.1%.
The H100 platform is currently the top-of-the-line chip platform in the market. However, Nvidia has developed a new platform, Blackwell, expected to be released later this year. The Blackwell platform performs 4x faster in training LLM models and 30x faster in inferencing (where the trained LLMs draw conclusions from new inputs) compared to the H100 platform. Nvidia faces the risk of overdeveloping their chips, where customers may wait out certain generations of chips to get the next generation, which is significantly better. Nvidia, however, is confident that current demand far outstrips current supply for both the H100 and Blackwell chips.
Nvidia developed the CUDA software platform to expand the use of its chips in various applications, including AI. However, CUDA is exclusive to Nvidia’s chips. Due to the heavy reliance on Nvidia’s chips, their limited supply, and high costs, other developers have created an open software platform called Triton. This platform allows developers to run AI applications on an array of other chips.
Nvidia also faces significant competition in the chip design field. They are not only competing with established designers like AMD, but also with well-capitalized companies such as Amazon and Microsoft, who are developing their own chips to reduce their reliance on Nvidia. Nvidia has stated that their chip cycle is one year between each generation, so competing companies are aiming at a moving target going at breakneck speed.
Nvidia, Amazon, and Microsoft are held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Nvidia – Silicon Supreme Read More »
Last week, Walmart released their Q1 2025 results. The group’s revenue reached $161.5 billion for the quarter, growing 6% year-on-year. Operating income rose by 9.6% to $6.8 billion. Walmart’s gross margin increased from 23.7% a year ago to 24.1% this quarter. This improvement was due to fewer inventory markdowns compared to last year. Additionally, Walmart’s advertising business, which typically has a higher gross margin than general retail, has been growing faster than other parts of the business, contributing to the overall margin increase. With this in mind, Walmart’s management team stressed that they are trying to keep their product gross margin as low as possible so as to incentivise more customers to shop with them. Walmart indicated that they have seen a meaningful increase in higher-income earners shopping at their stores. Walmart’s e-commerce business grew by 22% on a quarter-to-quarter basis, showing good returns on their technology spend.
Walmart and other large retailers generally perform well in inflationary environments. They can buy in bulk, which helps lower their prices. Additionally, when they place orders in advance, they secure prices at that time. Once the goods are delivered and ready to be sold, the new, higher inflationary prices are evident in the economy. This allows them to sell at those higher prices or slightly less, giving the impression of saving customers money compared to smaller and/or less efficient businesses that order closer to the time of sale.
Walmart faces intense competition worldwide. They not only compete against local retailers but also against giants like Amazon, which has a highly profitable cloud business. From its inception, Walmart has focused on serving underrepresented locations, offering customers an all-in-one store with “everyday low prices.”
Walmart is held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio Clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Walmart – The Best Offense starts in Defense Read More »
Disney, once the vanguard of the entertainment industry, now faces the challenge of overseeing its various business divisions. From linear networks to streaming, theme parks to cruises, and sports to merchandise; Disney is trying to sustain its established cash cows while simultaneously investing in and nurturing the growth of its other ventures. But in doing so, it has been burning through cash, fighting boardroom proxy battles, and losing clout with consumers.
For Q2 2024, revenue for Disney increased by 1.3% to reach $22.1 billion. And operating income increased by 15% to reach $3.8 billion. Direct-to-consumer, which includes streaming services such as Disney+ and Hulu, posted its first ever quarterly operating profit, which was $47mn. This was driven by cost-cutting that Disney has implemented in their operations and content spend. Hulu programmes such as “The Bear” and “Shogun” drove the new signups to Disney’s streaming services. Disney’s experiences segment, the cash cow, generated $8.4bn in revenue, with an operating profit of $2.3bn for the quarter. Disney noted that they expect sales for their experiences segment to drop during the year, as the pent-up demand for experiences, built up during the Covid Pandemic, subsides.
Under Bob Chapek’s (Disney’s previous CEO) tenure, Disney has poured substantial resources into productions across its various studios: Marvel, Pixar, Star Wars, and Fox. However, many of these endeavours have failed to replicate the box office triumphs of previous years, particularly during Marvel’s illustrious heyday. These productions were intended to serve as the cornerstone for Disney’s streaming services to flourish, but the over expansion lead to disappointing figures.
During the earnings call, Disney acknowledged that Netflix has established the gold standard for streaming. Netflix consistently leads the industry, often pioneering new features, such as the recent crackdown on password sharing, a move that has proven effective in recouping lost revenue. Netflix have been what other streaming services are trying to replicate. However, If you were to ask about Netflix’s primary competitor, Netflix would likely point to YouTube. Netflix has previously hinted at this perspective. YouTube’s exceptional consumer engagement aligns with Netflix’s preferred focus of measuring the duration of viewers’ attention on screen.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Disney – Where’s the Magic? Read More »
Amazon, once an online bookseller, has gradually transformed into the expansive “everything store.” Utilizing its efficient fulfillment infrastructure, Amazon swiftly delivers both its own products and third-party products worldwide. While its e-commerce segment drives the bulk of revenue, the true profit engine lies in its cloud division: AWS. In the latest quarter, Amazon’s North American e-commerce unit generated $86 billion in revenue with a 5.7% operating margin, while AWS generated $25 billion in revenue with a notable 37.6% operating margin. Amazon’s free cash flow was $50.1bn for the last twelve months, demonstrating its significant financial strength.
Amazon is renowned for identifying pain points within their own operations and devising solutions to overcome them, and then selling that solution as a service to third parties. In this way, they turn cost centres into profit centres. When they managed their internet servers, they noticed significant periods of dormancy in their IT infrastructure, punctuated by occasional spikes in usage. Recognizing this, Amazon seized the opportunity to create AWS. Instead of companies needing to set up and manage their IT infrastructure, Amazon does it for a fee, based on usage. Today, global enterprises rely on AWS to power their entire operations. Now, AWS is increasingly being employed by companies to train their generative AI models. Amazon observed that many companies are still in the training phase of their generative AI products, and that the products aren’t available for the market just yet.
Amazon has followed the same principle with regards to their fulfillment service. Companies are able to sell their products internationally on Amazon’s platform, while not needing to go through the process of figuring out the complicated rates and tariffs they are required to pay in each country.
Amazon’s reach extends far beyond e-commerce and cloud computing. They also run a video-streaming platform, own a significant share of an electric car company (Rivian), and operate an advertising business integrated with their e-commerce operations, which generated $11.8 billion in revenue this recent quarter. Advertising, known for its high operating margins, is likely to contribute to Amazon’s growing profitability.
Yet, amidst their diverse ventures, Amazon faces formidable competition. Beyond rival e-commerce and traditional retail businesses, they contend with tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft. Big Tech is also facing increased regulatory pressure around the world.
Amazon’s origins in a low-margin environment have instilled a cost-effective mindset into their DNA. They have shown, time and again, how to develop new products and services while keeping costs low.
Amazon and Microsoft are held in the Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund and by Lunar Capital’s Offshore Portfolio clients.
Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.
Our email address is: [email protected]
Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.
Amazon – Not your everyday Bookseller Read More »
Insights to your Inbox
Contact Details
Lunar Capital (Pty) Limited, registration number 2015/013022/07 is an authorised South African financial services provider (FSP 46567) established in 2015. As a licensed Financial Services Provider in terms of the FAIS Act, Lunar Capital (Pty) Limited accepts responsibility for its representatives acting within their mandates, in rendering services defined by FAIS. Our key individual and representative meet the fit and proper requirements as prescribed by FAIS.