Big Tech, Big Spend, Big Question

Author: Danyaal Munshi

Big Tech, Big Spend, Big Question

Over the last two weeks, mega-cap stocks such as Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft released their quarterly results. The theme was AI, particularly how much the cloud service providers were paying to build up their capacity and try to win the AI race. Investors were concerned that the cloud service providers were spending too much without clear indications of the large-scale end use cases of AI, the value derived from it, and whether businesses and people would be willing to pay for these products and services. 

Due to the long time it takes to build these data centers and the logistical challenges in securing land, buildings, and chips, the big cloud providers stated that demand still exceeds supply for their AI capabilities. Additionally, they mentioned that the data centers being built offer optionality; if generative AI doesn’t take off, the data centers can be repurposed for other uses; although it will be at a lower operating margin. 

The graph below shows the difference in capital expenditure by the big tech firms this year. Everyone but Apple has significantly increased their spending to build up their capacity for generative AI workloads—whether for training or inferencing. During the earnings calls, all the big tech CEOs indicated they would continue to spend at these increased levels to ensure they don’t miss out on the generative AI opportunity. 

Capital Expenditure

At the moment, the company seeing a real and significant increase in revenue and earnings is Nvidia, the designer of the high-powered chips used to train and inference the data workloads for generative AI. Nvidia is expected to release their results on the 28th of August. The search is on for the companies that will utilize AI within their own operations to give themselves the edge and gain market share in their own industry and possibly beyond. 

Security
Key Indicators

Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.

Our email address is: [email protected]

Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet  can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.

Share article

Latest Posts

CrowdStrike’s latest quarterly results reflect a business that continues to scale at an impressive rate, while also illustrating some of the tensions between growth, profitability, and valuation that increasingly define the cybersecurity sector. The company reported total quarterly revenue of $1.39 billion, up 26% year-on-year, reinforcing its position as one of the fastest-growing large-cap cybersecurity platforms. Growth was supported by strong demand across its Falcon platform, with net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $256 million, up 32%. This brought total ending ARR to $5.51 billion, a 24% increase, highlighting the durability of its subscription-based model and the continued expansion of its installed base. Despite this top-line momentum, profitability remains work in progress. CrowdStrike reported a GAAP operating loss of $30.6 million, a meaningful improvement from the $108.7 million loss recorded in the prior period, but still indicative of a business investing heavily in growth. While the trajectory is clearly improving, the pace of margin expansion remains a key area of focus for investors, particularly as the business scales. A central theme in management’s commentary was the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The company pointed to what it described as an inflection point, where AI is not only enhancing defensive capabilities but is increasingly being weaponised by attackers. The proliferation of AI-driven threats raises the complexity and frequency of cyberattacks, reinforcing the need for advanced, real-time protection. In this context, CrowdStrike’s access to leading AI models through partnerships with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic stands out as an important competitive advantage. These relationships, alongside collaborations with Microsoft and IBM, position CrowdStrike at the centre of an evolving ecosystem where cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, and AI capabilities are becoming deeply interconnected. Stock-based compensation still remains elevated and continues to weigh on the company’s path to sustained profitability. While common across high-growth technology businesses, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders and, at current levels, raises questions about long-term margin structure. Valuation is another important consideration. CrowdStrike continues to trade at a premium relative to its revenue base, reflecting both its growth profile and its perceived strategic importance in the cybersecurity landscape. However, this also leaves less room for execution missteps. Notably, while revenues grew by 26%, this fell short of some market expectations, suggesting that the bar remains high and that incremental disappointments can have an outsized impact on sentiment.
Crowding out the Competition
Cybersecurity for the AI era
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Brick and E-commerce
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Nvidia - Taking on the "Wannabes"
Nvidia – Taking on the “Wannabes”
What does the chief beneficiary of AI's results tell us about the broader market. 

Lunar Capital
on Eastwave Radio

Every Wednesday, at 07h45, Sabir chats with Nazia from Eastwave Radio (92.2 fm, live stream on
www.eastwave.co.za) on investing and the markets.

eastwave-radio