SpaceX-cluded

Author: Danyaal Munshi

SpaceX-cluded

SpaceX’s long-awaited IPO has arrived with historic force. The company raised approximately $75 billion in what is now the largest IPO in history, valuing the business at close to $1.8 trillion as of Friday. In the process, Elon Musk, who retains roughly 42% ownership, has effectively become the world’s first trillionaire.

With companies like Anthropic and OpenAI reportedly eyeing public markets, SpaceX’s success signals that investor appetite for large, narrative-driven technology listings remains firmly intact. Companies tend to go public when market conditions are most favourable. Elevated valuations and strong liquidity allow businesses to raise significant capital while diluting less equity than they otherwise would in more subdued markets.

There are clear signs that this dynamic was at play. Retail demand alone exceeded $100 billion, though individual investors ultimately received only around 20–25% of the allocated shares. The bulk went to sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, and large asset managers.

SpaceX is positioning itself as a platform for multiple future industries. The company plans to deploy IPO proceeds across an ambitious set of projects, including its Starship rocket programme, a proposed million-person Mars colony, a future lunar economy, and orbital AI data centres capable of delivering computing capacity from space.

These ambitions are undeniably bold, but they highlight a key concern. Most of these industries do not yet exist in any meaningful commercial form. Their success is uncertain, the timelines are long, and the capital requirements are enormous. While the IPO prospectus references a $28.5 trillion addressable market, this figure is largely theoretical and depends on markets being created, rather than simply captured.

At its current valuation, SpaceX is trading at over 100 times last year’s revenue. For context, Amazon trades at a fraction of that multiple, around 3.7 times revenue and 29 times earnings. SpaceX generated $18.7 billion in revenue last year while posting a loss of $4.9 billion, reinforcing the gap between valuation and current financial performance.

The company’s AI initiatives also raise questions. Unlike peers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, where demand for AI infrastructure continues to exceed supply, SpaceX appears to have excess compute capacity, to the point where it is leasing some of it out to companies like Alphabet and Anthropic.

In the near term, the stock may benefit from favourable technical dynamics. Over the coming weeks, passive index funds tracking major benchmarks such as the Nasdaq, FTSE, and MSCI are likely to begin purchasing shares following SpaceX’s fast-tracked inclusion. This will bring millions of pension savers and holders of passive instruments into the shareholder base indirectly.

Security
Indicators

Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.

Our email address is: [email protected]

Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet  can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.

Share article

Latest Posts

What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market.
SpaceX-cluded
What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market
CrowdStrike’s latest quarterly results reflect a business that continues to scale at an impressive rate, while also illustrating some of the tensions between growth, profitability, and valuation that increasingly define the cybersecurity sector. The company reported total quarterly revenue of $1.39 billion, up 26% year-on-year, reinforcing its position as one of the fastest-growing large-cap cybersecurity platforms. Growth was supported by strong demand across its Falcon platform, with net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $256 million, up 32%. This brought total ending ARR to $5.51 billion, a 24% increase, highlighting the durability of its subscription-based model and the continued expansion of its installed base. Despite this top-line momentum, profitability remains work in progress. CrowdStrike reported a GAAP operating loss of $30.6 million, a meaningful improvement from the $108.7 million loss recorded in the prior period, but still indicative of a business investing heavily in growth. While the trajectory is clearly improving, the pace of margin expansion remains a key area of focus for investors, particularly as the business scales. A central theme in management’s commentary was the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The company pointed to what it described as an inflection point, where AI is not only enhancing defensive capabilities but is increasingly being weaponised by attackers. The proliferation of AI-driven threats raises the complexity and frequency of cyberattacks, reinforcing the need for advanced, real-time protection. In this context, CrowdStrike’s access to leading AI models through partnerships with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic stands out as an important competitive advantage. These relationships, alongside collaborations with Microsoft and IBM, position CrowdStrike at the centre of an evolving ecosystem where cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, and AI capabilities are becoming deeply interconnected. Stock-based compensation still remains elevated and continues to weigh on the company’s path to sustained profitability. While common across high-growth technology businesses, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders and, at current levels, raises questions about long-term margin structure. Valuation is another important consideration. CrowdStrike continues to trade at a premium relative to its revenue base, reflecting both its growth profile and its perceived strategic importance in the cybersecurity landscape. However, this also leaves less room for execution missteps. Notably, while revenues grew by 26%, this fell short of some market expectations, suggesting that the bar remains high and that incremental disappointments can have an outsized impact on sentiment.
Crowding out the Competition
Cybersecurity for the AI era
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Brick and E-commerce
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon

Lunar Capital
on Eastwave Radio

Every Wednesday, at 07h45, Sabir chats with Nazia from Eastwave Radio (92.2 fm, live stream on
www.eastwave.co.za) on investing and the markets.

eastwave-radio