The Spotify Trade-Off

Author: Danyaal Munshi

The Spotify Trade-Off

The music streaming industry is fiercely competitive, with major players like Apple, YouTube, Amazon, and Spotify vying for market share. While Apple, YouTube, and Amazon offer music streaming as a complementary service to their broader ecosystems, Spotify stands out by focusing solely on audio streaming as its core product. The company is, however, expanding into other media formats to diversify its offerings. 

Spotify operates two primary services: 

  1. Premium – a subscription-based model offering an ad-free experience with full feature access. 
  2. Ad-Supported – a free tier with limited features and advertisements.

As of the latest quarter, Spotify reported 713 million total users, an 11% year-over-year increase. Of these, 281 million were Premium subscribers (up 12% YoY), while 446 million used the ad-supported service (up 11% YoY).  

Spotify generated €4.23 billion in revenue, a 7% increase YoY. The slower revenue growth relative to subscriber growth was primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. The company reported a gross margin of 31.6%, up 50 basis points from the same quarter last year; and operating income of €582 million, a 28% increase YoY, driven by a slight reduction in operating expenses. 

Despite Premium users comprising only 39% of the total user base, they accounted for 90% of the company’s revenue. To boost monetization of its ad-supported tier, Spotify is expanding its advertising inventory. New partnerships with Amazon and Yahoo will provide advertisers with programmatic access to Spotify’s audio and video ad space. Additionally, the company is exploring new Premium tiers aimed at music enthusiasts, allowing it to serve a broader range of price points and potentially increase market share. 

Spotify’s most significant challenge remains profitability at scale. The company pays approximately 70% of its net revenue to rights holders, including music labels and artists. Payouts range from $0.003 to $0.005 per stream, depending on factors such as listener location, subscription type, and contractual terms. 

Another structural cost is the 30% platform fee charged by Apple’s App Store and Google Play for in-app purchases, which further compresses margins. 

While Spotify has recently shown modest profitability, its continued investment in new features and services could increase operating expenses. Moreover, the intensely competitive environment poses a risk to long-term profitability, especially as rivals leverage their broader ecosystems to subsidize their music offerings. 

Key indicators
Key indicators

Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.

Our email address is: [email protected]

Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet  can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.

Share article

Latest Posts

What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market.
SpaceX-cluded
What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market
CrowdStrike’s latest quarterly results reflect a business that continues to scale at an impressive rate, while also illustrating some of the tensions between growth, profitability, and valuation that increasingly define the cybersecurity sector. The company reported total quarterly revenue of $1.39 billion, up 26% year-on-year, reinforcing its position as one of the fastest-growing large-cap cybersecurity platforms. Growth was supported by strong demand across its Falcon platform, with net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $256 million, up 32%. This brought total ending ARR to $5.51 billion, a 24% increase, highlighting the durability of its subscription-based model and the continued expansion of its installed base. Despite this top-line momentum, profitability remains work in progress. CrowdStrike reported a GAAP operating loss of $30.6 million, a meaningful improvement from the $108.7 million loss recorded in the prior period, but still indicative of a business investing heavily in growth. While the trajectory is clearly improving, the pace of margin expansion remains a key area of focus for investors, particularly as the business scales. A central theme in management’s commentary was the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The company pointed to what it described as an inflection point, where AI is not only enhancing defensive capabilities but is increasingly being weaponised by attackers. The proliferation of AI-driven threats raises the complexity and frequency of cyberattacks, reinforcing the need for advanced, real-time protection. In this context, CrowdStrike’s access to leading AI models through partnerships with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic stands out as an important competitive advantage. These relationships, alongside collaborations with Microsoft and IBM, position CrowdStrike at the centre of an evolving ecosystem where cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, and AI capabilities are becoming deeply interconnected. Stock-based compensation still remains elevated and continues to weigh on the company’s path to sustained profitability. While common across high-growth technology businesses, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders and, at current levels, raises questions about long-term margin structure. Valuation is another important consideration. CrowdStrike continues to trade at a premium relative to its revenue base, reflecting both its growth profile and its perceived strategic importance in the cybersecurity landscape. However, this also leaves less room for execution missteps. Notably, while revenues grew by 26%, this fell short of some market expectations, suggesting that the bar remains high and that incremental disappointments can have an outsized impact on sentiment.
Crowding out the Competition
Cybersecurity for the AI era
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Brick and E-commerce
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon

Lunar Capital
on Eastwave Radio

Every Wednesday, at 07h45, Sabir chats with Nazia from Eastwave Radio (92.2 fm, live stream on
www.eastwave.co.za) on investing and the markets.

eastwave-radio