No Cap to CapEx

Author: Danyaal Munshi

No Cap to CapEx

In Q3 2025, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon demonstrated their deep commitment to artificial intelligence through aggressive investment and infrastructure expansion. Alphabet reported $102.3 billion in revenue, with AI driving growth across Google Cloud and consumer products. Over 650 million users engage with its Gemini model, and nearly half the code generated for Google products is now AI-generated. Google Cloud’s $155 billion backlog, up 82% year over year, shows an ever-increasing demand. Alphabet is continuing to increase their capital expenditure (CapEx). Alphabet plans to spend $75billion to $85 billion in capital expenditure this year.

Microsoft posted $77.7 billion in revenue and $38 billion in operating profit, with Azure growing 40% year over year. Its $392 billion commercial remaining performance obligation signals robust future demand. CapEx rose 74% to $34.9 billion, with half spent on short-lived GPU assets. Microsoft finances 44% of CapEx through leases. Microsoft is expanding its data center footprint around the world to meet sovereign requirements. The pace of spending, especially on rapidly depreciating hardware such as GPUs, poses risks if demand softens. However, the company is building out its infrastructure in a way that gives them flexibility in how they utilise their infrastructure. If demand drops in one area the infrastructure can be used in another area.

Amazon reported $180.2 billion in net sales, with AWS contributing $33 billion. They have a backlog of $200 billion, excluding the announcement post their results presentation of a $38bn deal to supply OpenAI with capacity.. AI infrastructure expanded by 3.8 GW, with plans to double overall capacity by 2027. Q3 CapEx reached $34.2 billion, with full-year estimates at $125 billion. Its Tranium chip business grew 150% quarter over quarter, and Tranium 2 is fully subscribed. Amazon’s strategy of offering both custom and NVIDIA chips provides flexibility. Amazon is also investing aggressively in its ecommerce fulfilment business. The company incurred Federal Trade Commission fines in the US. They also announced a restructuring to cut 15% of its corporate workforce, to reduce corporate bureacracy. This has resulted in their operating income remaining flat year over year.

Collectively, these companies are building the backbone of the AI economy, but the risks of overspending on CapEx are real. With billions committed to infrastructure, the pressure to deliver returns, manage depreciation, and adapt to fast-moving technological change will define their success in the AI era.

Security
Lunar Capital Indicators 4

Click here to access your account to view statements, obtain tax certificates, add or make changes to your investments.

Our email address is: [email protected]

Disclosures
Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd is a registered Financial Services Provider. FSP (46567)
Read our full Disclosure statement: https://lunarcapital.co.za/disclosures/
Our Privacy Notice: https://lunarcapital.co.za/privacy-policy/
The Lunar BCI Worldwide Flexible Fund Fact Sheet  can be read here.
This stocktake is prepared for the clients of Lunar Capital (Pty) Ltd. This stocktake does not constitute financial advice and is generated for information purposes only.

Share article

Latest Posts

What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market.
SpaceX-cluded
What does the SpaceX IPO say about the broader market
CrowdStrike’s latest quarterly results reflect a business that continues to scale at an impressive rate, while also illustrating some of the tensions between growth, profitability, and valuation that increasingly define the cybersecurity sector. The company reported total quarterly revenue of $1.39 billion, up 26% year-on-year, reinforcing its position as one of the fastest-growing large-cap cybersecurity platforms. Growth was supported by strong demand across its Falcon platform, with net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $256 million, up 32%. This brought total ending ARR to $5.51 billion, a 24% increase, highlighting the durability of its subscription-based model and the continued expansion of its installed base. Despite this top-line momentum, profitability remains work in progress. CrowdStrike reported a GAAP operating loss of $30.6 million, a meaningful improvement from the $108.7 million loss recorded in the prior period, but still indicative of a business investing heavily in growth. While the trajectory is clearly improving, the pace of margin expansion remains a key area of focus for investors, particularly as the business scales. A central theme in management’s commentary was the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The company pointed to what it described as an inflection point, where AI is not only enhancing defensive capabilities but is increasingly being weaponised by attackers. The proliferation of AI-driven threats raises the complexity and frequency of cyberattacks, reinforcing the need for advanced, real-time protection. In this context, CrowdStrike’s access to leading AI models through partnerships with firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic stands out as an important competitive advantage. These relationships, alongside collaborations with Microsoft and IBM, position CrowdStrike at the centre of an evolving ecosystem where cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, and AI capabilities are becoming deeply interconnected. Stock-based compensation still remains elevated and continues to weigh on the company’s path to sustained profitability. While common across high-growth technology businesses, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders and, at current levels, raises questions about long-term margin structure. Valuation is another important consideration. CrowdStrike continues to trade at a premium relative to its revenue base, reflecting both its growth profile and its perceived strategic importance in the cybersecurity landscape. However, this also leaves less room for execution missteps. Notably, while revenues grew by 26%, this fell short of some market expectations, suggesting that the bar remains high and that incremental disappointments can have an outsized impact on sentiment.
Crowding out the Competition
Cybersecurity for the AI era
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon
Brick and E-commerce
How do you compare Walmart to Amazon

Lunar Capital
on Eastwave Radio

Every Wednesday, at 07h45, Sabir chats with Nazia from Eastwave Radio (92.2 fm, live stream on
www.eastwave.co.za) on investing and the markets.

eastwave-radio